[LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

[hollunder at gmx.at]

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:09:02 +0100
Fons Adriaensen <fons at kokkinizita.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:15 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
> > > 
> > > > But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't
> > > > from the free/open source software communities. It doesn't
> > > > conform to neither the free software definition nor the open
> > > > source definition.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that
> > > > the software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further
> > > > restrictions on the work, if I read the license correctly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards
> > > rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's
> > > Republic of China, mid 1960s) ?
> > 
> > Because you're trolling? :)
> 
> No, it reminds me because of the wording. I guess I've grown to
> be allergic to any statements of the form
> 
>  "You are not a true Communist/Christian/Moslim/American/..."
> 
> as if the writer, waving some canonical document or little book,
> would be able to judge about that. 
> 
> It's part of the typical "us and them" way of thinking, which is
> usually a source of misery only.
> 
> Ciao,

FYI, I talked to Justin and tried to get him over here, but he won't
join the discussion. 
In his opinion there's too much zealotism here and thus he sees it as a
waste of time. Also, regarding the initial quote he said that it was an
opinion rather than a statement of fact.

I would have liked to see a discussion, whatever the outcome may have
been.
Looks like it's not gonna happen.

Best Regards
	Philipp