<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I have a very similar question to the previous 'FLTK vs GTKmm' question.<br>
<br>
I'm trying to start up a new Open Source Project. This project assumes
use of high end audio cards along with creation, processing and
recording of audio frequency PCM data that is being transmitted and
received from the audio card(s). Development is expected to be in a
Linux environment.<br>
<br>
Seems like many audio applications and I expect and hope that it can
use many already created audio software modules but the application
isn't a normal audio application. The objective is to create a
Software Oriented Metal Detector suitable for Humanitarian Demining.
Full information can be found at<br>
<br>
<a href="http://humanise.org">http://humanise.org</a><br>
<br>
The audio frequency PCM data is not actual audio but rather the
generation of the coil transmit frequency and the reception, processing
and storage of the metal detectors receive coil data.<br>
<br>
To start such an Open Source Project requires standardizing on
standards for the modules and the proposed standards have the project
being based on GStreamer modules. One of the most difficult questions
in coming to the current proposed standards was whether to use GTK+
or QT. There was a lot more related audio software using GTK+ but
this appeared to be due to previous licensing problems that have now
been fixed. <br>
<br>
The current proposed standards for this project and discussion on this
can be found at<br>
<br>
<a href="http://humanise.org/software">http://humanise.org/software</a><br>
<br>
You will also find a brief analysis of most Linux open source audio
software at <a href="http://humanise.org/software-base">http://humanise.org/software-base</a>.
This separates the software to those using GTK+ vs those that use QT.<br>
<br>
You will also find analysis of standards suitable for basing the
modules on at <a href="http://humanise.org/streaming-options">http://humanise.org/streaming-options</a><br>
along with analysis of tools and environments at <a
href="http://humanise.org/environment-options">http://humanise.org/environment-options</a>
and <a href="http://humanise.org/ide">http://humanise.org/ide</a><br>
<br>
I don't consider myself to be either a Linux/Unix Guru or an Audio
software Guru so the initial design of this is very much a learn as I
go along. I would now like to get some input on all of this from
people who have more knowledge in these areas.<br>
<br>
Comments including constructive criticism welcome either through this
mailing list or, better still, on the Humanise.org website.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Ken Dawber<br>
<br>
<br>
Christian wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4A7FC04D.8010203@freenet.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
Thanks for your advices!
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org">http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a>
iEYEARECAAYFAkp/wE0ACgkQVC26eJ+o0+2UQACePLcVXkXSwPygZrC1sQnDUWC0
hk0AmgNmgru7KzOfYCkGppoqldsam5GH
=BzmB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev</a></pre>
<pre wrap=""><hr size="4" width="90%">
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a>
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.49/2293 - Release Date: 08/09/09 18:10:00
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>