[LAU] Lash 0.6.0-rc2 compiling help

[Nedko Arnaudov]

Ray Rashif <schivmeister at gmail.com> writes:

>> Shouldn't there be an '-I/usr/include' appearing above?
>
> Yes, there should be nothing "local" in the Makefile if you do a search.
> Most probably pkg-config isn't right, but this should not happen in Debian.
> Paths aren't the problem here, though. Try:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr \
>                 --without-jack-dbus
>
> I've read there's a problem with jack1+dbus. Sorry I can't be of more
> qualified help, but an e-mail to a Debian package maintainer, lash and jack
> dev will definitely shed light.

LASH using jack1+dbus is indeed not good combination. But I doubt the
compilation problem is related to this.


Joel Roth <joelz at pobox.com> wrote:
> Could there be a JACK version problem? LASH expects
> jack_version > 0.99, but the latest JACK I have is 0.116.
> I had just hacked that part:
>
> MISSING_REQUIRED="    JACK >= 0.1"

So you disabled a check against jack2. I think lash was working with
jack1 in dbus-less mode but I havent tested it much.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20090203/c8eab392/attachment.pgp