[LAU] GPL vs GPLv3
Atte André Jensen
atte at email.dk
Thu Jun 10 09:53:37 UTC 2010
On 2010-06-10 11:38, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Atte André Jensen wrote:
>> 1) Can I Just Do It, simply by stating on the webpage and/or in the
>> software that it's under GPLv3.
> If its your code, then yes.
I just realized that I also have done some software patches (diff files)
to some software, mostly a couple of patches to the chuck sourcecode.
How about that? It seems that chuck is under LGPL, if it matters...
> Fors software licenses, this:
> is really good.
> CC Attribution (or maybe CC Share Alike) is probably best for synth patches.
Thanks! Again is it simply a matter of stating on the web page that the
licence is CC Attribution?
More information about the Linux-audio-user