[LAU] edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?
capoeirista at arcor.de
Thu Nov 18 22:10:03 UTC 2010
Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 20:05:27, você escreveu:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:28:04PM -0200, Fabio wrote:
> > Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 18:37:30, fons at kokkinizita.net escreveu:
> > > For these tests the authors used 'audiophile' DVD-A recordings
> > > (mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
> > > or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
> > > transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results
> > > emerged from this:
> > >
> > > 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> > > reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> > > versions.
> > >
> > > 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> > > other versions of the same music released on CD.
> > well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard
> On the contrary, the test showed that the listeners could *not* hear
> the difference.
well I refered to Number 2 as 1 + 2 say diferent things
More information about the Linux-audio-user