"The tools you use to make your music affect the way you make it, so<br>affect your music."<br><br>Oh yes, I agree--the process should encourage and enhance, but never dictate or let the musician fall back on pre-programmed formulas. However, the listener should only hear music, not the tools themselves.
<br><br>"You can't analyse all the parameters that affect your spirit, just be<br>conscious the you are not a numeric working machine and not close like<br>a chip to your envirronment."<br><br>Not 100% certain what you mean, but I *think* it reflects my feelings.
<br><br>Cheers!<br><br>--Nick<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Causse</b> <<a href="mailto:nomoa@wanadoo.fr">nomoa@wanadoo.fr</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 07:02:17PM -0800, Nick Scheer wrote:<br>> Whoah. Have you considered switching to decaf?<br>><br>> ;)<br>><br>> Seriously, I make music on Linux because I like Linux/FOSS, and I like
<br>> to make music. I also love having access to great FREE tools, even if<br>> I have to work a little harder to put it all together.<br>><br>> I personally don't feel that the tools used to create are all that
<br>> relevant to someone listening to the finished product.<br><br>Try to see the question with another point of view.<br>The tools you use to make your music affect the way you make it, so<br>affect your music.<br>You can't analyse all the parameters that affect your spirit, just be
<br>conscious the you are not a numeric working machine and not close like<br>a chip to your envirronment.<br><br>my 2 bits<br><br></blockquote></div><br>