i second that. i have been going thru a lot of source code (i have it all on my hd anyway, so might as well) in the hopes of picking up on how to program. strange place to start i know. but important programs like ghostess (which i realize isn't meant to be a full-blown dssi host, but is the best "simple" option atm) really need to be lash compliant in order to be fully usable.
<br><br>of course, a wishlist could go on for ages so i'll stfu ;)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Stone</b> <<a href="mailto:jamesmstone@gmail.com">jamesmstone@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Just wondered if anyone has considered adding Lash compatibility<br>to ghostess? It would really make seq24 an even more amazing
<br>program than it is already....<br><br>It is a shame more linux audio apps have not picked up on lash.<br>IMHO it is one of the key things preventing linux audio from<br>steaming ahead of the competition..<br><br>I would be more than happy to put in time to help with this, if
<br>there is anything I can do.. I am afraid my c skills are rather<br>poor though, and I would not know where to start with this,<br>unless someone could point me to some nice example code!<br><br>Anyway, please don't read this post as moaning. It is just
<br>written with the earnest hope of improving the situation with<br>linux audio.<br><br>James<br>_______________________________________________<br>Linux-audio-user mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>james/everamzah