I am not part of the jackit-dev list, so if you could forward answers from them to me I would appreciate it. I will be attempting to keep track of it via the archives though.<br><br><br><blockquote>And on the other hand, if you are wrong, which I think you are, although
<br>I'm not 100% sure about that, you could be responsible for<br>continuing to spread a(nother) misunderstanding about jackdmp. (The<br>previous one was that jackdmp could not work on single processor machines)<br><br>
</blockquote><br>Oh I don't have a problem with being corrected on it, just that particular answer didn't do much to actually answer the question(Which it was a question, not a statement) as you noticed. I appreciate the help and corrections though, don't get me wrong though, otherwise I wouldn't have posted at all;)
<br><br> Seablade<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Kjetil S. Matheussen</b> <<a href="mailto:k.s.matheussen@notam02.no">k.s.matheussen@notam02.no</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>(CC-ed to jack-audio-dev list)<br><br><br>"Thomas Vecchione":<br>><br>> Seablade
<br>><br>> On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <<a href="mailto:k.s.matheussen@notam02.no">k.s.matheussen@notam02.no</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>> "Thomas Vecchione" <<a href="mailto:seablaede@gmail.com">
seablaede@gmail.com</a>><br>>>><br>>>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right<br>>> now?<br>>><br>>> No.<br>>><br>> Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will handle 4,8, or 16 cores
<br>> well?<br>><br><br>Sorry, that was a short rude answer, especially since I'm not 100% sure of<br>the answer either. But I would be surprised if jackdmp was limited to two,<br>or any other high-value fixed number of, parallel sound processing
<br>threads.<br><br>And on the other hand, if you are wrong, which I think you are, although<br>I'm not 100% sure about that, you could be responsible for<br>continuing to spread a(nother) misunderstanding about jackdmp. (The
<br>previous one was that jackdmp could not work on single processor machines)<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Linux-audio-user mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user</a><br></blockquote></div><br>