i'm not able to access that pc at the moment, but i will when i get a chance.<br><br>thanks<br>porl<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 14/10/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Florian Schmidt</b> <<a href="mailto:mista.tapas@gmx.net">
mista.tapas@gmx.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Sunday 14 October 2007, porl sheean wrote:<br>> i have actually had no end of trouble with ubuntustudio's (and now
<br>> ubuntu's) rt kernel. on an amd 6000+ system with 1gig ram and a rme9652<br>> soundcard i can't get reliable performance under 40 or so ms. i even tried<br>> a vanilla kernel with the rt patches and had the same trouble. the 64studio
<br>> kernel worked fine, however. i'm currently running at 5ms with it and have<br>> had no problems. this is even with compiz fusion running and spinning the<br>> cube whilst playing back audio from an 18 channel ardour project. what
<br>> patches would cause such a difference in performance? it isn't any options<br>> selected in 'make menuconfig' - i loaded the 64studio's ones in and used<br>> them. still no luck. i can only assume they have added more patches to do
<br>> with realtime performance than just the -rt patchset. any ideas?<br><br>Hi,<br><br>let us see the output of this script on your ubuntu RT box with jackd running:<br><br><a href="http://tapas.affenbande.org/rt-setup-report.sh">
http://tapas.affenbande.org/rt-setup-report.sh</a><br><br>Thanks,<br>Flo<br><br>--<br>Palimm Palimm!<br><a href="http://tapas.affenbande.org">http://tapas.affenbande.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br>