agreed, though the conversation itself was useful, the prokeys88 is hardly a decent example. I hadn't heard about it until this thread and this morning I saw one on display at guitar center. The keys were mush and it sounded like any typical 'softsynth wrapped by some plastic'.
<br><br>-brad<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 4, 2007 9:26 AM, Michal Seta <<a href="mailto:mis@artengine.ca">mis@artengine.ca</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> > Le Dimanche, 02 Décembre 2007 15:53:30 +0000,<br>> > Gordon JC Pearce <<a href="mailto:gordonjcp@gjcp.net">gordonjcp@gjcp.net</a>> a écrit :<br>> > > You still haven't posted a sample of it.
<br><br></div>That particular patch (that Ianas finds so rich) can be heard here:<br><a href="http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProKeys88-main.html" target="_blank">http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProKeys88-main.html
</a><br><br>demo patch number 12.<br><br>To me it sounds like strings samples with slow attack through<br>chorus+reverb and a bit of low pass filtering.<br>So I think that all the talk about swsynths vs. hwsynths is irrelevant
<br>as this particular instrument seems to be sample-based. I guess it<br>could very easily be achieved with fluidsynth (loaded with a decent<br>soundfont) and optionally jack-rack with a couple of LADSPA plugins.<br><br>
I really don't see what the fuss is all about.<br><br>Cheers.<br><br>./MiS<br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>Linux-audio-user mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br></div></div></blockquote>
</div><br>