<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 15:12, Emanuel Rumpf <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:xbran@web.de">xbran@web.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2008/9/18 Anders Dahnielson <<a href="mailto:anders@dahnielson.com">anders@dahnielson.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">><br>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 14:28, Emanuel Rumpf <<a href="mailto:xbran@web.de">xbran@web.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> The sad truth is: There currently is no real open patch specification.<br>
>> (And if there was one, it would take some time to become spread and<br>
>> accepted.)<br>
><br>
> That's not true. SFZ is an open and free specification. I know, I'm working<br>
> on an implementation of the SFZ 2.0 spec.<br>
><br>
</div>If it is free, where do I get that specification 2.0 ?<br>
The last time I've had a look at it, the publication was out of date<br>
and incomplete.</blockquote></div><br>The SFZ 2.0 is currently only available in the book 'Cakewalk Synthesizers' by Simon Cann. Note that I'm not talking free as in beer here.<br><br>I've tried to publish some errata for the 1.0 spec regarding stuff that I've come across:<br>
<br><a href="https://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=186">https://bb.linuxsampler.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=186</a><br><br>-- <br>Anders Dahnielson<br><<a href="mailto:anders@dahnielson.com">anders@dahnielson.com</a>><br>
</div>