<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 14:28, Emanuel Rumpf <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:xbran@web.de">xbran@web.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
The sad truth is: There currently is no real open patch specification.<br>
(And if there was one, it would take some time to become spread and accepted.)<br>
</blockquote><div><br>That's not true. SFZ is an open and free specification. I know, I'm working on an implementation of the SFZ 2.0 spec.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Having a look at the linuxsampler page, they say libgig is "pure GLP v1".</blockquote><div><br>That is incorrect. The library libgig is licensed under GPL version 2.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<a href="http://linuxsampler.org/downloads.html" target="_blank">http://linuxsampler.org/downloads.html</a><br>
I just checked the libgig sources and could not find any commercial exception.<br>
<br>
Now, if it is pure GPL, then there is a free implementation for the<br>
gig format as well !!</blockquote><div><br>Yes, libgig is indeed licensed without an exception.<br> </div></div>-- <br>Anders Dahnielson<br><<a href="mailto:anders@dahnielson.com">anders@dahnielson.com</a>><br>
</div>