You mean.....the notes show up before I play them? Awesome!!!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:00 AM, pete shorthose <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zenadsl6252@zen.co.uk">zenadsl6252@zen.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:04:40 +0100<br>
Jörn Nettingsmeier <<a href="mailto:nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de">nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Simon W. Fielding wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > OK - I now have a working basic FC10 system - relevant details are :-<br>
> ><br>
> > Hardware: Toshiba Tecra M3<br>
> > Kernel: 2.6.26.8-1.rt15.1.fc10.ccrma.i686.rt<br>
> > Jackd: jackdmp 1.9.1<br>
> > ffado: 2.0-0.6.rc1.fc10.ccrma (libffado 1.999.40)<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Initial cursory testing shows (no recording load, just an idle mixer<br>
> > with nothing connected) :-<br>
> ><br>
> > jackd -R -dfirewire -r96000 -p16 -n3 ... jackd won't even start - uses<br>
> > too much CPU<br>
> > jackd -R -dfirewire -r96000 -p32 -n3 ... jackd won't even start - uses<br>
> > too much CPU<br>
><br>
> these are insanely low settings.<br>
> i have never *ever* heard of anybody running successfully at -p16 -n3,<br>
> and you are trying it at 96k. for the rest of us, that would be -p8!<br>
><br>
> imnsho, -p128 should be perfectly fine for 96k. don't waste your time<br>
> "tuning" your system for latencies below that.<br>
<br>
</div>Meh. If you ask me, negative latency is the future.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
pete.<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>