<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:41, Arnold Krille <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arnold@arnoldarts.de">arnold@arnoldarts.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:06:29 Anders Dahnielson wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 20:39, Arnold Krille <<a href="mailto:arnold@arnoldarts.de">arnold@arnoldarts.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:30:53 Ken Restivo wrote:<br>
> > > OK well that throws a monkey wrench into my plan to convert the studio<br>
> > from<br>
> > > Mac/ProTools to Linux/Ardour. Damn.<br>
> > Maybe you can start by convincing them about Mac/Ardour?<br>
> > I don't really understand why mac-users (especially if they paid premium<br>
> > money<br>
> > for hardware) should switch to Linux where half their hardware isn't<br>
> > supported... Shouldn't ardour (through jackd/portaudio) play perfectly<br>
> > one the<br>
> > digi-stuff?<br>
> Yes. but I think you answered the question yourself in the last sentence.<br>
<br>
</div></div>I did? I didn't say "Make them buy overpriced proprietary stuff to use it with<br>
free software", I said "If they already happen to have the bad proprietary<br>
stuff, why try to convince them off the full free ensemble where they have to<br>
spend more money on new hardware if they could just do a smooth transition by<br>
switching one component at a time?" Applies both for Mac/ProTool and<br>
Mac/Motu...<br>
<br>
Or is the digi-stuff not usable with apples' portaudio?<br></blockquote></div><br>Oh, I think I missread. Sorry. <br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Anders Dahnielson<br><<a href="mailto:anders@dahnielson.com">anders@dahnielson.com</a>><br>