<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/3/30 Jörn Nettingsmeier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de">nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Arda Eden wrote:<br>
> Sorry if this is discussed before but,<br>
><br>
> Some DAW software can bounce mixdown to an output file directly (like<br>
> cubase or reason).<br>
> But many audio people claim that this kind of bouncing is not good at<br>
> all. They say that bouncing real-time<br>
> (like with protools or by routing all the tracks to a new stereo track's<br>
> input) is better resulting for audio quality.<br>
><br>
> Now,<br>
> My consideration is that, there should be no difference between the two<br>
> because theoretically the software<br>
> should be writing the same data in both ways.<br>
><br>
> Am I missing something ?<br>
<br>
</div></div>unless the software is doing something very, very stupid, you are<br>
perfectly right. the people who argue quality issues are probably those<br>
who use gold-plated toslink connectors on their cd decks...<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>Or $5,000 patch cables on their mixer.<br><br>:)<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Parchment Studios (It started as a joke...)<br>