<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/5/28 Asmo Koskinen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asmo.koskinen@arkki.info">asmo.koskinen@arkki.info</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Tom Dunstan kirjoitti:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Asmo, you seem to be quite happy... any ideas?<br>
<br>
</div>Yes I am. Here is my laptop with Echo AudioFire4.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_02.png" target="_blank">http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_02.png</a><br>
<br>
This time latency is 8 ms. Where, when and why someone needs something<br>
like 3 ms?</blockquote><div><br>Here we aim at 1.6ms with the hope of at least 2.7ms<br>If you do monitoring and using real time fx while recording one or more tracks with a mixing console then 8ms is really a bad latency.<br>
<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I follow this statement here: "Apple considers everything < 10ms as<br>
'good enough'. And the audio pro's seem to be very happy with Apple."</blockquote><div><br>I got a patch for this: "Apple considers everything good enough if you plan to spent 500$/€ more than the rest of computers only to have a fancy apple picture on the box" <br>
<br>;-)<br><br><br>cheers<br>-r<br></div></div><br>