Atte Andre Jensen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:atte.jensen@gmail.com">atte.jensen@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">
<br>
</div>I'm not sure what a 90's environment looks and and acts like, could you<br>
elaborate a bit?<br>
<br>
Funny thing is, this must mean I just stepped down to an 80's<br>
environment (openbox under arch), although I did this very deliberately<br>
and it feels like a step *up* :-)</blockquote><div><br><br>That should've been obvious from the statement itself. Since GNOME looks and acts like a 90's environment, a 90's environment looks and acts like GNOME.</div>
<div><br>OK, no more suspense. Basically, OS 9.</div><div><br>WMs like Awesome, Xmonad, *box are not in the equation. In fact, they _are_ a step up because they serve their purpose of being (lightweight or not) window managers. I'm an Xmonad user as well.</div>