2009/9/25 drew Roberts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zotz@100jamz.com">zotz@100jamz.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">
On Thursday 24 September 2009 22:39:58 Ray Rashif wrote:<br>
> Even if he does not, he has the<br>
> right to determine how his software should be used, what should be patched,<br>
> what should be improved.<br>
<br>
</div>Ah... What?!!! The right? (As in it some how has some bearing on us and our<br>
rights as users of that same software and our rights to determine such things<br>
for ourselves?) Please explain your thinking here. I can see such thinking<br>
from the non-Free world, but not sure how what I see being said fits in the<br>
Free world. (So perhaps I am seeing something that was not said...??<br>
<br>
all the best,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
drew<br>
</font><div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Uhh..no. He has the right in his domain. A third-party has his rights as well, and that's when it's called a "fork" :) So let me simplify:<br></div><div><br>
</div><div>You don't like it, then take it your way.</div><div><br></div><div>We're lucky our devs are friendly. Well, most of them.</div>