Hey.<br><br>My Realtek ALC 888 is able to get about 5.3ms as reported by jackd.<br><br>Andrew.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Dave Phillips <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dlphillips@woh.rr.com">dlphillips@woh.rr.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Scott Ecker wrote:<br>
> david wrote:<br>
><br>
>> ...<br>
>><br>
>> I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and<br>
>> seemingly trying to get even lower ...<br>
>><br>
><br>
> You can't punch-in at 64ms and expect it to sound good. At 4ms it's<br>
> seamless, literally.<br>
><br>
><br>
Indeed. I think the ll issue is of real importance when recording. At 64<br>
ms multitrack recording/playback is a not very satisfying experience.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
dp<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>