<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Well the reason for why I'd like to develope tX is its midi capabilities and the workflow.<BR>
I want to use it as a sampler triggered by an external sequencer, and not actually as a DJ-proggy. I dont know how good the midi capabilities of Mixx are. <BR>
<BR>
In general Mixxx and tX are incomparable, since Mixxx only allows for 2 turntables, or am I wrong?<BR>
Gerald<BR>
<BR>
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:20 +0100, Dubphil wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
rosea grammostola a écrit , Le 30.12.2009 22:53:
> gerald mwangi wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll start to work on it, but it will take some time.
>> Maybe someone has experience with librubberband?
>> Gerald
>>
> Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you
> better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw?
> It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.
> I could be wrong though.
>
> Regards,
>
> \r
>
Mixxx hasn't the same scratch taste, Tx scratch effect is really
amazing, I don't know why...
IMHO It would be nice to make it survive, but personnaly I don't need
the Ableton feature :)
Regards
Philippe
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</A>
<A HREF="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user</A>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>