<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:53 AM, rosea grammostola <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rosea.grammostola@gmail.com">rosea.grammostola@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">
</div>Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you<br>
better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw?<br>
It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.<br>
I could be wrong though.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
\r<br>
</blockquote></div><br>While I agree with the sentiment here, I'd like to add a voice of support for continued development on TerminatorX. To me it has always been one of the most "fun" apps on linux to play with, and I think that's vital. The one thing that always held it back to me was individual track outputs in Jack - mixing down to stereo was always a buzz killer to an otherwise fast and enjoyable workflow.<br>
<br>-m<br>