<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Philipp Überbacher a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:1285869274-sup-2811@eris" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Excerpts from Robin Gareus's message of 2010-09-30 17:32:56 +0200:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 09/30/10 15:57, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, September 30, 2010 2:22 am, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fons@kokkinizita.net">fons@kokkinizita.net</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:43:42PM -0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Perhaps an easier way to do this in the future is to just present your
evidence up front instead of trashing other peoples hard work with vague
off hand and out of context remarks.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Where did I do that ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Here's the greatest hits:
"It's a good example of textbook DSP being applied blindly
and without understanding the consequences. "
"But it's a kludge, and a solution to a
problem that shouldn't exist in the first place."
"As said, there are two issues with the EQ. The first is that the
implementation is subobtimal and introduces artefacts that have
to be (and are to some extent) hidden by changes added after the
initial release. The second is that this type of filtering allows
and invites to do things that do indeed 'destroy' the sound from
a purist POV, while adding nothing useful from any other POV."
and I suppose this was just plain vindictiveness
"Don't know where you get this, but I assume it's not the result
of your own intellectual efforts and so I can just say 'bullshit'
(the pure liquid variety actually).
I won't even comment on the rest, as I'd have to be at least
as rude :-) "
Don't know why I got the impression you were being rude or anything...
Must be just me.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Some of these are quite amusing and IMHO most of them justified in the
original context.
..but more importantly none of them was a personal insult.
Which can not be said about some of your comments.
If you want my take on it: pipe it into a text-to-speech synth and make
a RAP song out of it: "Parental Advisory Explicit Lyrics." Bonus points
if you manage to work Bob M's Jammin' into it and master it with jamin
Come to think of it we might even start a petition for the Unplugged
version of it featuring Fons at the next Linux Sound Night :)
peace,
robin
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Yeah, let's start a new trend, from dissing to flaming. Songs instead of
mails. I guess it would double the number of Linux Audio songs in no
time.
</pre>
</blockquote>
+1, I agree "100% X (y/w+(x2-AB3/4))" with the Bob Marley's cover
masterd with Jamin...<br>
the name of this band is talking heads, OUPS ! The name of this list is
LINUX AUDIO USER <br>
I meant... These days it looks like a flame trolling stuff; sure we get
many knowledge shared<br>
in it (maybe not? as a matter of fact, don't care about maths, what I
like is sound-and Jamin-))<br>
but maybe some people will get more karmic bonusses with music practice
instead of post here.<br>
Just my advice, with big respect for Linux gurus concerned (if any).
PEACE.<br>
PS : Maybe, there are some lists around here, reserved to dev people,
where.... SMILE, MEN !<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1285869274-sup-2811@eris" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>