I have never noticed any artifacts with downconverting of samplerate, except on lower-quality Windows conversion software and early versions of Steinberg Wavelab (no relation!). Upconversion is another story....is there a quick and easy way to measure if conversion artifacts are present in an audio file?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:paul@linuxaudiosystems.com">paul@linuxaudiosystems.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eric Steinberg<br>
<<a href="mailto:eric.steinberg@gmail.com">eric.steinberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate? Just curious; I use<br>
> 44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 if I want<br>
> really high fidelity- but I've never used 88.2.<br>
<br>
</div>its 2x 44.1 so that resampling to CD format is very artifact free, but<br>
you get the benefits of a higher SR.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>