<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/11/18 Florian Faber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:faber@faberman.de">faber@faberman.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Thomas,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Im not very into this stuff, but you can certainly hear the difference.<br>
<br>
</div>This is, with all due respect, bullshit. On the technical side, there is<br>
no difference, just a waste of bandwidth.<br>
<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div>Of course a higher SR gives better sound. Wich you can easily hear if you use your ears. There is a reason to use 44.1k and not 8k on CD for ex. And there is a reason for listening to LPs instead of CDs <br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
> If you eq in 44.1k you get that early nineties techno high end.<br>
<br>
</div>If you hear differences, your filters and/or converters are broken.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>Maybe the plugins I use are crappy. But nevertheless if you raise a level in a digital eq it makes good sense that it distorts because you move the points away from each other and thus making the wave more of a square? <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Flo<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.<br>
public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://<a href="http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net" target="_blank">wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>