<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 12/02/2010 09:13 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4CF7FDD3.5070203@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, fred wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4CF7FB7A.2080606@yahoo.fr" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
Folderol a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:20101202141748.43cedc51@debian" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:44:20 +0100
Hartmut Noack <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:zettberlin@linuxuse.de"><zettberlin@linuxuse.de></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am 02.12.2010 10:59, schrieb Philipp Überbacher:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Excerpts from Hartmut Noack's message of 2010-12-02 09:40:47 +0100:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.12.2010 14:29, schrieb Batz:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Y-ellow All.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">[snip]
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">So anyway, if any of this sound familiar and is easily fixed then I'd be
over the moon to hear about it. Or alternatively, should I move on to
try another distro?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">All I can say: a friend of mine here in Germ, who was heavily advocating
AVLinux last year, is now explicitly warning users NOT to use AVLinux 4.1.
Bad RT-Performance and other smaller issues he reports. Seems, AVL has
switched from Debian to Ubuntu. The very same step, that was one of the
last steps in the life of 64Studio....
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">64studio is dead?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Not officially dead yet, but smelling quite funny to me....
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I've been waiting for an update on this too :(
However, the good news is that I've found I get very reasonable results using a
minimal debian squeeze then pulling in a rt kernel and just the audio packages
I want.
If anyone is interested I can post the crib sheet I made as I installed it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Please post it Folderol, it could be really nice when Squeeze goes to
stable !<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
By the way, they seems to be busy with a Multimedia blend for Debian.
They can use some help and support afaik. You're welcome.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom">http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia">http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
On 12/02/2010 09:49 PM, Folderol wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20101202204903.3848c57c@debian" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">automake
build-essential
cmake
cmake-curses
dssi-dev
fluid
git-all
libasound2-dev
libfftw3-dev
libjack-dev
liblircclient-dev
liblo-dev
liblrdf0-dev
libmxml-dev
libqt4-dev
libsamplerate0-dev
libsndfile1-dev
libxml++2.6-dev
subversion
xutils-dev
zlib1g-dev
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hmm this is an interesting list... With these packages you can build
all/ most of the proaudio packages?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
\r<br>
</body>
</html>