if you wanna play live, probably.<div>usually a 10ms latency or lower is small enough not to be perceptible.</div><div><br></div><div>if you want to work on a mix down with no live at all, a higher latency will allow more calculation power for the effects (as these take time to run)...</div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/2/3 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fons@kokkinizita.net">fons@kokkinizita.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:04:36PM +0100, Lilli Chiffon wrote:<br>
<br>
> > current settings: RT=true; Priority: 89; Frames: 1024; SR: 44kHz,<br>
> > Periods/Buffer: 3; and my latency is 69.7mS<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Isn't it too high ?<br>
<br>
It is what can be expected with these values:<br>
<br>
3 * 1024 / 44100 = 0.069659.<br>
<br>
Ciao,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
FA<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>