<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Renato <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rennabh@gmail.com">rennabh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
but pro level has nothing to do with user friendliness. I mean of<br>
course we want the linux audio environment to improve, but that has<br>
nothing to do with a pretty DE where you don't need to use the terminal<br>
or tweak one or two .conf files<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>Actually I would disagree. Yes whether a tool can be sued for professional projects is one thing, but the difference is in speed. These days a professional level tool is one that allows you to accomplish your task as quickly as possible with as few distractions as possible. This is generally also inferred to be user friendliness, but not necessarily, it does however mean that you shouldn't need to spend time doing extra things that could be done for you, like configure your OS just so you can work;)</div>
<div><br></div><div> Seablade</div><div><br></div><div>Who has used and continues to use Linux for professional projects.</div>