<div dir="ltr">Ok didn't think that way, but definitely sounds interesting.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Renato <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rennabh@gmail.com">rennabh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:18:50 +0300<br>
Moshe Werner <<a href="mailto:moshwe@gmail.com">moshwe@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I hoe that I'm not totally out of context,<br>
> but wouldn't that introduce latency to the control signal (AD/DA<br>
> conversion)?<br>
<br>
</div>I guess yes, but since it's a control signal, it probably wouldn't be<br>
noticeable<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> Why would it be preferable over MIDI in first place?<br>
<br>
</div>well the idea was to do DSP on the signal with the usual tools (ladspa,<br>
lv2, rakarrack etc.) which you can't do directly on MIDI. I.e. you could<br>
do things like filtering, distortion, delay, reverb etc. on the control<br>
signal, which you can't on MIDI.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
<font color="#888888">renato<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>