<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Arnold Krille <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arnold@arnoldarts.de">arnold@arnoldarts.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 11:23:09 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:<br>
> On 10/19/2011 10:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:<br>
> > +1, regarding to Jamin is good and it does work without pumping.<br>
><br>
> I'm not so fond of JAMin. It has flaws and consumes way too much CPU.<br>
> About a year ago Patrick Shirkey mentioned that there was no other JACK<br>
> application that attempts to provide a complete mastering chain. But<br>
> that was about a year ago, at the moment it is perfectly possible to<br>
> create a similar tool chain with the help of plug-ins. I prefer plug-ins<br>
> then, more flexible.<br>
<br>
Completely rebuilding Jamin with single plugins will consume even more cpu<br>
than jamin itself. The reason is that jamin is actually built from plugins<br>
(the look-ahead and the compressors are plugins) but also merges plugins<br>
internally to optimize for speed...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I haven't had issues per se with CPU resources (whern I am using Jamin, I am not doing anything else except recording the output), but what are the alleged flaws in Jamin?</div>
</div><div><br></div>-- <br>Brett W. McCoy -- <a href="http://www.electricminstrel.com" target="_blank">http://www.electricminstrel.com</a><br>------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."<br>
-- Jelaleddin Rumi<br>