<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Atte André Jensen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:atte@email.dk" target="_blank">atte@email.dk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 2012-05-11 08:50, Ralf Mardorf wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<a href="http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51360" target="_blank">http://aur.archlinux.org/<u></u>packages.php?ID=51360</a> says that they're at<br>
linux-rt 3.2.16_rt27-1, so I'm OT again, if you insist in using 3.3.4,<br>
but perhaps this is the better way to go, using the "default" kernel-rt.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
You're right!<br>
<br>
It has its quirks, and I didn't remember getting better rt perf from it. But I've now switched back, and will return with more info after some time on this kernel.<div class="im HOEnZb"><br><br></div></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>By the way, there is also apparently an "LTS" RT kernel in the AUR for those wanting something hopefully more stable:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56195">http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56195</a>
</div><div><br></div><div>michael</div></div>