<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#333333" text="#CCCCCC">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/03/2013 08:04 PM, Marc Lavallée
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20131203150440.25b11626@hacklava.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:49:57 +0100,
hermann meyer <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:brummer-@web.de"><brummer-@web.de></a> a écrit :
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am 03.12.2013 14:23, schrieb Dan MacDonald:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">KXStudio is a freely downloadable and easy to use GNU/Linux
operating system that focuses on audio and video production. The
installation disc includes a comprehensive selection of
ready-to-run multimedia production software
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The include package list looks a bit outdated, isn't it?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/Paste/GvxoV">http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/Paste/GvxoV</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
You'd better look at the Packages lists from the repositories:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ppa.launchpad.net/kxstudio-team/ppa/ubuntu/dists/">http://ppa.launchpad.net/kxstudio-team/ppa/ubuntu/dists/</a><dist>/main/binary-amd64/Packages
Replace <dist> by lucid, maverick, natty, oneiric, precise, quantal,
raring, or saucy
For example, in precise, jack2 version is 1.9.10~git20130908</pre>
</blockquote>
No, that is wrong.<br>
<br>
KXStudio uses a lot of separate repositories, and now it's even
moving to Debian based repos.<br>
Only 12.04.x (precise) use the "old" kxstudio-team PPAs now.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>