[Consortium] Linuxaudio.org Management Board
eviltwin69 at cableone.net
Wed Feb 18 17:38:14 EST 2004
I agree that many organizations can't/won't sign up to that
restriction. I would think that we're probably only talking about
copyright infringement (including GPL issues), and patent infringement.
Copyright infringement shouldn't be an issue for a company using
proprietary code since we won't be seeing it anyway so we won't be
copying it. GPLed code could be used by a company that doesn't disclose
the source but, again, how would we know? The only real problem I can
see arising would be submarine patents. Those of us developing Open
Source code probably won't be filing patents ;-) Are these the only
issues or am I missing something?
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 10:36, jaromil wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:23:41PM +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> > > "Members of the Linuxaudio.org consortium agree not to sue other
> > > members, or otherwise instigate prosecutions of members, following a
> > > dispute over reverse engineering."
> > Two comments as input for your discussion:
> > 1. Currently nothing prevents a member to leave the consortium to be
> > able sue a (former) member. If a significant amount of money is
> > involved this could happen. In practice this clause therefore does not
> > seem to have a binding effect.
> > 2. It is very unlikely that any company lawyer (that is: big
> > companies) would agree to such a condition.
> yes ok, but if we cannot even agree to not sue each other, why to be
> part of a consortium anyway? :))
> - --
> jaromil, dyne.org rasta coder, http://rastasoft.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: http://gnupg.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Consortium mailing list
> Consortium at lists.linuxaudio.org
More information about the Consortium