andrea.glorioso at agnula.org
Sat Jan 24 05:56:58 EST 2004
Joern Nettingsmeier <nettings at folkwang-hochschule.de> writes:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> [re marek's point that linuxaudio.org should be a "portal" to all major
> linux audio efforts]
Just for the record, Marek is not subscribed to Consortium (maybe you
already knew, I don't know).
>> > It represents the linux audio developers, the linux audio users,
>> > linux audio applications/projects.
>> > I hoped it to be a home for LAD, LAU and LAA, and to offer more -
>> > community news, documentiation and tutorials, etc.
>> As I already told you, I'm more than willing to propose, as soon as
>> the voting rules are established, that specific subdomains of
>> linuxaudio.org be devoted to such services.
>> I personally won't have the time to work on the actual services. I'm
>> confident that willing people will do that. Are you volunteering?
> once linuxaudio.org has had time to work out their aims and policies
> in more detail, i would like to propose that linuxaudio.org, the lad page
> and possibly others (such as dave's and patrick's site) work out a
> corporate design of sorts (or maybe just a logo) and form a web ring.
That's a very good idea IMHO. Technically speaking what's needed to
have a webring?
> in that context, the offer of subdomains is very interesting.
I think it would help "closing the gap".
> for the time being, i think it's best not to bring the subject to
> LAD again, but in the long run, once linuxaudio.org has more clearly
> defined itself, i'd like to discuss the web ring idea on the list
> and see what can be done.
I'm not sure what are the missing points on the TODO list for
"defining" the consortium. Daniel?
More information about the Consortium