[Consortium] Official fork

rosea.grammostola rosea.grammostola at protonmail.com
Fri Feb 19 20:41:56 CET 2021



‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, February 19, 2021 7:36 PM, Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org> wrote:

> On 2/19/21 6:56 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>
> > The linuxaudio.org consortium doesn't release nor host software.
>
> Keep in mind thatlinuxaudio.org does offer hosting servives to projects
> and members.
>
> It is still the main site for getting lilypond binaries. and there are
> various other projects hosted and released on linuxaudio services.
>
> e.g.
>
> -   http://download.linuxaudio.org/
> -   http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html
>
>

I see, but these are just background hosting services right? Mostly for multimedia distros with large ISO files. But there is no 'linuxaudio.org marketing' around it, nor does they pretend it is released by linuxaudio.org, nor is it released on the github page of linuxaudio.

So stating that generic rule about hosting software is difficult you say.

The core of the problem is clear though I think and we agree that they can't pretend they are linuxaudio.org or are releasing as it was a original linuxaudio.org release.

I also think it's fair to conclude that they don't need any hosting services from linuxaudio.org. They've their own websites which they can use. It's also no problem to start a own github/gitlab project.

So it's still fair to decide that they should remove all relation to linuxaudio.org, including the github page (within a reasonable timespan, like two weeks).

Of course, a generic solution/ rule would be good so we don't have this issue with other projects in the future again.

Maybe others have ideas for such a generic rule?

\r


More information about the Consortium mailing list