[Jack-Devel] Netjack 2: how to improve reliability by allowing greater latency?

[André Pinto]

Yes, I tried netjack 1 but then went for netjack 2 to use Opus.
On May 22, 2015 12:56 PM, "Paul Davis" <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:

> but it also hasn't been updated to be able to use opus, in the way that it
> was in the jack2 tree (robin gareus did this a couple of years ago).
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
> wrote:
>
>> netjack 1 hasn't been modified in four years, at least not in the jack1
>> source tree.
>>
>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Torben Hohn <torbenh at linutronix.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:28:50PM -0500, David Nielson wrote:
>>> > I was hoping someone who knows more would chime in. It's been a LONG
>>> > time since I used Netjack, but I thought there was an option to add
>>> > extra periods of latency, specifically for what you're requesting? And
>>> > it was this capability that allowed some people back in the day to do
>>> > recording sessions internationally?
>>>
>>> That was realised with netjack ONE.
>>> It can tolerate packet loss.
>>>
>>> However, that was more than 4 years ago.
>>> I dont know about the current state of things.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Torben Hohn
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>>> Jack-Devel at lists.jackaudio.org
>>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> Jack-Devel at lists.jackaudio.org
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/jackaudio/attachments/20150522/250cf3ef/attachment.html>