[Jack-Devel] Usage feasibility Q

[Filipe Coelho]

On 27.01.2018 16:53, Chris Caudle wrote:
>> 3. JACK "mixer" -> JACK DSP plugin -> JACK out (hw:0,0)
> Rather than a plugin, you will likely find it easier to develop a stand
> along jack application.  The jack design is not really made for having
> plugins in the server.

The JACK internal clients API disagrees with you ;)
Internal clients are faster to run, since they dont require context 
switches between different processes.
They're harder to control externally though.