<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Filipe Coelho <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:falktx@gmail.com" target="_blank">falktx@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
On 30.01.2016 17:13, Paul Davis wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Sometime in the next two weeks, I will
find the time to deal with a variety of pull
requests for JACK 1, update some articles on
<a href="http://jackaudio.org" target="_blank">jackaudio.org</a>
(notably FAQ stuff), and do a new release of
JACK 1.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Great!<br>
Does this include the latest patch from Fons too?<span class=""><br></span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It will, yes.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class=""><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I'd be happy to take care of the maintenance of the code (making
sure it works on new distros, dealing with pull requests, etc).<br>
But only if someone else is willing to handle the non-coding parts,
like the website.<span class=""><br></span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The website doesn't change much. The "Applications" page already has its own maintainer (though it also doesn't change much). I think you already have push access on github, so ... great.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
</span><br>
Anyway, I got a question for you Paul.<br>
What do you think about the jack1 dbus patch?<br>
Having that in would allow to have the same dbus tricks jack2 uses
for pulseaudio.<br>
I know you don't truly agree on how it was done, but since you're
stepping down I know there's very little chance the "proper" way
will get done.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>my objection was that i think the dbus integration should be in a separate process that uses the server control API to start/stop a JACK server. <br><br></div><div>at this point, i don't think that my objection is worth anything at all, even though i still believe that my conception (the one that came out of the 2007 "Berlin summit") is "more correct". <br></div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">the reality is that nobody ever developed any other control protocols for JACK. there was talk of an OSC control app, but this never materialized. from a pragmatic perspective, dbus is the only control protocol that has ever emerged, and after many (many!) years in that condition, it makes sense to integrate that into the server itself.<br></div></div></div>