[linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

[Tim Hockin]

> > Uggh, can we keep the get() of control values simpler than events?  My
> > previos proposal had a control->get() method and a ctrl->set() method.
> > Obviously, the set() is superceded by events.  Is the get, too?
> 
> What is this for? If you want to implement this then they need to be
> events (well, sample accurate), but they sound like a pain to implement.

Well, my first thought is that we don;t want to send a CTRL_CHANGE event to
the host every time a control changes,  Do we want the host to have to send
CTRL_GET events and wait for CTRL_VALUE events, or can we say 'one tick
granularity is all the host can get' wrt CTRL_GET?