[linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

[Kjetil S. Matheussen]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
> > Tim Hockin wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
> > > > > instrument API must not support it?
> > > >
> > > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
> > > > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
> > >
> > > yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
> > > ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins.  That is very important.
> >
> > Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
> >
> LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API.
>
BAPULDAL - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API Backwards.

--