[Jackit-devel] Re: [PD-announce] Re: [linux-audio-dev] ANN: k_jack v0.0.0.5 and Mammut v0.15

[Paul Davis]

>> for myself, because its already possible to run pd as a JACK client,
>> the only interesting thing that i see in this effort is a push to ask
>> the question: does pd in fact run much better than JACK at the same
>> latency/buffer settings, and if so, why?
>>
>Oops, sorry for not making that question clear. I thought it was
>obvious actually.

the question or the answer?

and how well does pd handle moving 9-18MB/sec through its interaction
with an audio interface? ie. the read/write access model requires lots
of extra data copying.