[linux-audio-dev] re: JACK tutorial

[james at dis-dot-dat.net]

On Mon, 17 Nov, 2003 at 04:12AM +0000, Paul Brossier spake thus:
> Thanks for this tut.
> 
> Just one thought : the include statements in your code snipnets do not appear 
> correctly because of the <>. You could pass them through vim to take care of 
> the html characters (and add some color :).

Gah!  I can't believe I didn't notice that.

Thanks for the proofreading, and thanks for the vim tip.
 
> $ vim +f +"syntax on" +"so $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/2html.vim" +"wq" +"q" *.c
> 
> cheers, piem
> 
> On Tuesday 21 October 2003 14:56, james at dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct, 2003 at 01:19PM +0200, Mathias Lundgren spake thus:
> > > Great, great, great! Thanks a lot! IMHO, documentation like this one is
> > > definitely needed and something we're currently lacking. I've only
> > > skimmed it, but I'm going to read it more thoroughly later on, since it's
> > > stuff I need to read up on.
> > >
> > > That said, I'm a newbie on the subject, but I guess that makes me part of
> > > the targeted audience for the tutorial. I think you're explaining things
> > > very well. Of course, one can always look through code and find out what
> > > is going on when learning about things like these, but it's much better
> > > to also get the general idea of things before looking through the code.
> > > You're explaining both concepts and give examples, and do both very well.
> > > Good job!
> >
> > Thanks for the comments.  Let me know if you have any suggestions for
> > improvement.
> >
> > > /Mathias
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >   I've recently been learning to use JACK, and I had a look around for
> > > >   some kind of introductory article.  I couldn't find one, so I wrote
> > > >   the tutorial I would have wanted, as I learnt.
> > > >
> > > >   The tutorial is here:
> > > >   http://dis-dot-dat.net/jacktuts/starting/index.html
> > > >
> > > >   Please have a look, make suggestions.  Flames are fine, too.  Let me
> > > >   know if I've made some huge error.  Or maybe I'm not doing things
> > > >   the best way?  Whatever, let me know.
> > > >
> > > >   If this is well received, I'll write about more advanced topics as I
> > > >   get to them - mixing, the transport, threading without blocking the
> > > >   process callback, etc.
> > > >
> > > >   I'll probably be asking a lot of questions later on, especially
> > > >   about best practise.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks peeps,
> > > >
> > > > James
> 
>