[linux-audio-dev] libsndfile: type combinations and string data
Erik de Castro Lopo
erikd-lad at mega-nerd.com
Tue Aug 31 11:33:44 UTC 2004
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:30:41 -0600
martin rumori <lists at rumori.de> wrote:
> but, with 1.0.10 and 1.0.11pre4,
>
> SF_INFO info;
>
> info.format = SF_FORMAT_AIFF | SF_FORMAT_PCM_16 | SF_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
> if (! sf_format_check(&info))
> {
> printf("AIFF | LITTLE invalid\n");
> }
>
> info.format = SF_FORMAT_AIFF | SF_FORMAT_PCM_16 | SF_ENDIAN_BIG;
> if (! sf_format_check(&info))
> {
> printf("AIFF | BIG invalid\n");
> }
>
> yields me both an error. is that supposed to return true?
For sf_format_check() to return TRUE, you MUST also set the sample
rate, channel count and number of channels.
<snip>
> i don't know too much about the data organisation in .aiff and .wav,
> but if the comment is located in the head of the file, it could still
> be possible to write/change the data section in SFM_RDWR.
Yes, and that should be possible. What is not possible is
openning the file RDWR and modifying the string data in the
header.
> what do you
> think about letting sf_set_string() fail in any other mode than
> SFM_WRITE,
Yes, thats sound pretty sensible.
> but still allowing to open files with comments in SF_RDWR
> and to use the sf_writex_*() calls? (currently possible with AIFF,
> but not with WAV).
Are you sure?
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo nospam at mega-nerd.com (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Linux is produced to be used, whereas the others are produced
to be sold" -- Bobby D. Bryant
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list