[linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer

[Doug Wellington]

Previously:
> I'm not even going to justify that with a response - you're putting
> so many words into my mouth it's ridiculous.

<quotes>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:42:44 -0500 
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla at connect.carleton.ca> 
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer
> We hardly have any right to complain if we don't even express
> distaste with their newfound fascist strategy.

Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:57:11 -0500 
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla at connect.carleton.ca> 
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer 
> There are very valid technical reasons why a closed piece of hardware is
> a POS from a Linux user's perspective.
</quotes>

And the implicit meanings of those two quotes are?

> Anyway, read the email you're replying to again, note it's purpose, and
> decide if replying as you did was really a good idea.  Enough.  Please.

Can you help me by clarifying "it's purpose" [sic]...?  Maybe I've got it all wrong - I thought you were just bitching because RME didn't give you something you wanted and you were trying to rally the LAD troops to create a big stink to try to get RME to give it to you...  ;-)

> The question is not "why limit yourself".  I am not limiting myself.
> RME is limiting me.  (In a way.  Don't go there)

"Don't go there"?  If you don't want me or anyone else to go there, why bother bringing it up in the first place?  Are you trying to be a martyr?

-Doug