[linux-audio-dev] Re: linux-audio-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 62
Jason Walton
waltonj at acsd1.k12.co.us
Mon Jan 26 20:46:12 UTC 2004
Four hours of work for an IPOD
>>> linux-audio-dev-request at music.columbia.edu 1/26/2004 10:02:19 AM
>>>
Send linux-audio-dev mailing list submissions to
linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
linux-audio-dev-request at music.columbia.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
linux-audio-dev-owner at music.columbia.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of linux-audio-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [RFC] Lite OSC API (Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen)
2. RE: Modulars (Brad Arant)
3. Modulars (Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:35:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <k.s.matheussen at notam02.no>
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [RFC] Lite OSC API
To: linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58-L.0401261731570.12025 at iannis.uio.no>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
rd at alphalink.com.au:
>
> Since I think this is really important I will give an example, and
from the
> other end of a continuum. I use scheme for most of my music work.
> Scheme has a very sophisticated numerical tower. I might write (->
> "/n_set" 1001 "freq" 440) to set the frequency of an instrument at
SC3.
> The OSC encoder encodes values based on their lisp type, 1001 is an
> integer and gets encoded as 'i'. Lets assume that to the receiver
the
> frequency argument is a float, here I lose because 440 is an integer.
I
> argue that a receiver implemented like that is just wrong, that an
integer
> 440 frequency is completely valid, and SC3 thankfully agrees and
plays
> the right note.
>
For what scheme implementation are you using? And where can I get what
you are using?
--
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:51:19 -0800
From: "Brad Arant" <barant at barant.com>
Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] Modulars
To: "'The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List'"
<linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <200401261655.i0QGt1EO021207 at roar.music.columbia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have a few more for you since I still own some of these - don't hin
anybody has done emulators for them but I thought I would at least let
you
know they are there.
PAIA Modular
ARIES System II
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-dev-bounces at music.columbia.edu
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-bounces at music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
Juhana
Sadeharju
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 8:20 AM
To: linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Modulars
Hello.
Below is an unfinished list of modular synths. Better than nothing.
This kind of simple lists gives a good overall picture of the
situation.
For us developers the list should have following info: have source
code?
have manuals? have screenshots? have example instrument files?
I think I have collected enough all of that.
BTW, the paper on first interactive graphics system (I.Sutherland's
SketchPad 1963) gives the idea that the drawn circuit diagram could
directly
be used as input to the circuit simulators.
Digital modulars have been around as long but I could not find
anything
(between 1963-1980) on having a graphical frontend to them.
Of course, I do not have access to many old papers.
Regards,
Juhana
============================================================================
=
Source Graph Script
Name Code GUI UI Author/Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
AlsaModularSynth Yes Yes No M.Nagorni & F.Adriaensen
AnalogBox No Yes ? ?
Arts Yes Yes No ?
AudioMulch No Yes ? Ross Bencina
BlockCompiler OnHold No Yes M. Karjalainen
Building Blocks No Yes ? MIDI only
CPS No Yes ? Niels Gorisse
Csound Yes No Yes Barry Vercoe
Cmusic Yes No Yes ?
DirectCsound ? ? ? ?
DreamStation No ? ? Audio Simulation
Fugue Yes No Yes ?
Gabriel ? Yes ? ?
Galan Yes Yes ? ?
Gdam Yes Yes ? ?
Harmonizer/Vsig No Yes Yes Eventide
Infinity No Yes ? Sound Quest
InstrumentBuilder No Yes ? Mark Trombino, Csound
frontend
jMax Yes Yes Yes IRCAM
JSyn No ? ? ?
Kyma No ? ? Symbolic Sound
LabView No Yes Yes National Instruments
Matlab/Simulink No Yes ? Mathworks
MAX/MSP No Yes ? Cycling '74
Moog Modular V No ? ? Arturia
NMEdit Yes Yes No ?
Nord Modular No Yes No Clavia
Nyquist Yes No Yes R.B. Dannenberg
OASYS No ? ? Korg
OpenMusic ? Yes ? IRCAM
PatchWork ? ? ? ?
PD Yes Yes No Miller Puckette
Pulsar/Scope/Noah No Yes No Creamware
PSK Yes No Yes ?
Ptolemy Yes Yes ? ?
Quasimodo Yes Yes No Paul Davis
Reaktor No Yes No Native Instruments
Reality No ? ? Seer Systems
SAOL Yes No Yes ?
Scilab/Scicos Yes ? ? ?
Sildex/Signal ? ? ? ?
Spiralsynthmodular Yes Yes ? ?
SPT ? ? ? Synthetic Intelligence
Supercollider No ? Yes James McCartney
SynC Modular No ? ? ?
SynthBuilder Yes Yes ? Staccato Systems
Tassman No Yes No Applied Acoustics
Tempest No Yes ? Virtual Labs
Vaz Modular No Yes No STL/Martin Fay
VirSyn No ? ? ?
Virtual Waves No Yes ? Synoptic
Visual Orchestra No ? ? ?
WaveWarp No ? ? Sounds Logical
============================================================================
=
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:51:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <k.s.matheussen at notam02.no>
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Modulars
To: linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58-L.0401261742350.12025 at iannis.uio.no>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Juhana Sadeharju:
>
> Hello.
>
> Below is an unfinished list of modular synths. Better than nothing.
> This kind of simple lists gives a good overall picture of the
situation.
>
> For us developers the list should have following info: have source
code?
> have manuals? have screenshots? have example instrument files?
> I think I have collected enough all of that.
>
> BTW, the paper on first interactive graphics system (I.Sutherland's
> SketchPad 1963) gives the idea that the drawn circuit diagram could
> directly be used as input to the circuit simulators.
>
> Digital modulars have been around as long but I could not find
> anything (between 1963-1980) on having a graphical frontend to them.
> Of course, I do not have access to many old papers.
>
There was one with a graphical interface:
MusicBox No Yes No David Fahrland
And its from the 64-69 or something, implemented in fortran, had a
custom
made graphical interface, and supposedly was very much like Max, only
20 years earlier. The machine was placed at EMS/Sweden.
>From google I only found this information:
http://www.ballade.no/nmi.nsf/doc/art2003100811103357431448
(At the top there is a picture of the machine)
--
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
linux-audio-dev mailing list
linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
End of linux-audio-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 62
**********************************************
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list