[linux-audio-dev] malloc() in RT code considered not-so-harmful?
Olivier Guilyardi
ml at xung.org
Tue Jul 13 12:12:21 UTC 2004
Joshua Haberman wrote:
>
> 2. When your lock-free malloc needs more memory from the OS it will
> still take a system call to do it. I believe I have heard it said in
> the past that system calls of any sort are unacceptable in RT code, but
> isn't this a bit a of a hard-line position?
Is msgrcv() unacceptable as well, then ?
--
Olivier
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list