[linux-audio-dev] malloc() in RT code considered not-so-harmful?

Olivier Guilyardi ml at xung.org
Tue Jul 13 12:12:21 UTC 2004


Joshua Haberman wrote:
> 
> 2. When your lock-free malloc needs more memory from the OS it will 
> still take a system call to do it.  I believe I have heard it said in 
> the past that system calls of any sort are unacceptable in RT code, but 
> isn't this a bit a of a hard-line position?

Is msgrcv() unacceptable as well, then ?

--
     Olivier



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list