[linux-audio-dev] OSC for GUI-Engine communication

[Steve Harris]

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:34:48AM -0600, martin rumori wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > >The question is, which implementation is best?  All I can find is
> > >Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit.  What are the
> > 
> > afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that
> > sdk is just a total nightmare. the 2nd worst code i have ever
> > read. use liblo.
> 
> do you mean the sdk distributed by berkeley?  if you're speaking about
> libOSC++ from stetson university (part of the wiretap project), it
> doesn't wrap the berkeley thing.  when using the "fraunhofer" branch
> from cvs, it comes with some classes wrapping the unix network stuff
> (UDP and TCP).
> 
> if you don't need bundles, I'd go with liblo, cause it's really
> lightweight.

I agree. Thought its now really only the API thats lightweight, the code
is growing a bit :(

- Steve