Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))

Alfons Adriaensen fons.adriaensen at alcatel.be
Mon Mar 8 15:54:59 UTC 2004


On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:38:17PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:

> Yes, but we need to think carefully about the name, "_latency" or
> ".latency" might be a better choice, with a note that hosts should ignore
> _/. prefixed ports that they do not understand.

Agreed 100%. Votes++ for _latency.

-- 
Fons



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list