[linux-audio-dev] Re: LADSPA extension

[Alfons Adriaensen]

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:44:26AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:

> But it will use up two flags that may be needed later and may clash with
> future extensions, or produce binary imcompatibility. Not to mention that
> it is effectivly a fork in LADSPA.

There are still 20 bits left. And we can reserve #31 for a version jump anyway.
And I think 1.1 -> 1.2 is not a fork, it isn't meant to be anyway.

 
> I think this is a very, very bad idea.

Do you mean the proposal, or any premature implementation ?


-- 
FA