[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

[Jack O'Quin]

Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> writes:

> personally, i think its worth going through this pain. we will end up
> with a system in which new LADSPA extensions do not require changes to
> the API, which is a great thing. but it will be painful to get there,
> and i want to check that people don't mind doing it.

Seems like the right approach, but the devil is in the details.  The
current scheme, though wildly successful, has been hard to extend.  A
library API should be more manageable, if done carefully.
-- 
  joq