[linux-audio-dev] mux concept paper

mimo mimo at restoel.net
Thu Feb 17 13:42:44 UTC 2005

James McDermott wrote:
> oh - you wrote miXo - of course. (i wrote a peer machine or two.) go buzz devs!
> i think everyone who's ever used buzz for more than a couple of hours
> wants a new, stable, cross-platform version. (and there are *loads* of
> re-implementation projects, including at least one linux one.) i even
> have some semi-formed plans myself...

..want to go into more detail?
>>A lot of time is spent on finding the processing order. But this only
>>needs to be done once in a while.
> i'd be very surprised by that (i haven't looked at any code though).
> surely it's a very light task, computationally? i'm thinking that if
> the machine network is represented by a tree, just a depth-first
> search through the tree gets you the right processing order?
hmm..., maybe you right. I had something working about 2 years ago -- 
then called muzz :) -- and that spent most of it's time doing that tree 
thingy. But it was probably a bad way of doing it in general.. there is 
alos this thing about inputs and outputs or more general connectors and 
how to handle the logics behind them..


Please note that this account is being filtered using anti UCE systems. 
If you send email to this account make sure that it could not be 
mistaken as UCE.

More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list